ZRS Sonoma Race 2

Sonoma Raceway · March 14, 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P9You finished P9 of 9 in ZP2, 131 Laps behind the class winner. A mechanical issue was the primary gap (102:27).

P9 of 9

Class Position

131 Laps

Gap to Class P1

Laps Completed

1:46.024

Best Lap

•6th fastest on-track pace in ZP2 (median 1:47.525). On pace alone, a P6 finish.

•Lost 4h 18m across 3 mechanical stops

•Pit crew averaged 1:35.685 — 10.1s faster than class average

Where the Gap Came From

Analysis covers Laps 1-83 (car retired)

Reference car retired at Lap 114 — comparison covers partial race

On-track pace (68 laps):+22.8s

Driver errors (1 lap):-3.1s

Pit lane — team ops (3 laps):+175.7s

Pit in/out pace (3 laps):+10.4s

Mechanical (3 laps):+6146.9s

Code 60 (5 laps):+226.8s

Why you're behind #57 (P8 in ZP2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Biggest time loss

Mechanical (3 laps) at +6146.9s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

PACE

Trent Walko's best-10 pace was +1.5s/lap off pace setter across 21 laps

+31.2s

PACE

Kevin Boehm's best-10 pace was +0.8s/lap off pace setter across 27 laps

+22.1s

CONSISTENCY

Trent Walko's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.9s over 21 laps

+19.8s

CONSISTENCY

Kevin Boehm's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.6s over 27 laps

+17.4s

CONSISTENCY

Josh Green's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.6s over 25 laps

+14.7s

WARM UP

Josh Green averaged 2 warm-up laps at +0.9s each across 1 stint

+1.9s

WARM UP

Trent Walko averaged 2 warm-up laps at +0.6s each across 1 stint

+1.2s

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Josh Green. Most consistent: Josh Green.

Josh Green(pace setter)

25 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:46.332

vs Class Best

+1.3s

Consistency

0.6s(+-0.2s vs class)

Warm-up

2 laps+0.9s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Warm-up: 2 laps x +0.9s = 1.9s per stint (1.9s total)

Kevin Boehm

27 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:47.151

vs Class Best

+2.1s

Consistency

0.6s(+-0.2s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +0.8s/lap x 27 laps = 22.1s total

Trent Walko

21 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:47.819

vs Class Best

+2.7s

Consistency

0.9s(+0.1s vs class)

Warm-up

2 laps+0.6s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +1.5s/lap x 21 laps = 31.2s total

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Josh Green(pace setter)	25	1:46.332	--	0.586s	2 laps	--	--
Kevin Boehm	27	1:47.151	+0.819s	0.644s	1 laps	--	22.1s
Trent Walko	21	1:47.819	+1.487s	0.942s	2 laps	--	31.2s

Extreme laps (Code 60, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Josh Green	25	1:46.919	--
2	Kevin Boehm	27	1:47.795	--
4	Trent Walko	21	1:48.761	--

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

Stop Delta

-4

C60 Converted

2 of 6

Code 60 Windows

C60 #10:45:22Pitted

C60 #21:16:45Did not pit

C60 #33:38:54Did not pit — lap 3 of 17-lap stint

C60 #44:06:10Pitted

C60 #54:33:00Did not pit — lap 9 of 9-lap stint

C60 #64:44:50Did not pit

Show stop-by-stop detail (2 stops: 1 green, 1 under Code 60)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	--	Green	1:35.685	Kevin Boehm → Trent Walko
#2	4:36:46	C60	1:13.463	Trent Walko

Code 60 Impact (6 periods) — net +6237.6s

Period	Laps	Biggest Winner	Biggest Loser
C60 #1	25–28	#57 (-15.7s)	#98 (+6118.1s)
C60 #2	39–40
C60 #3	109–111		#98 (+101.9s)
C60 #4	122–124		#97 (+111.1s)
C60 #5	135–136	#80 (-2.2s)	#3 (+12.5s)
C60 #6	140–141	#3 (-15.2s)	#77 (+93.8s)

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Code 60 Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Actions for Next Race

Close pace gap for Trent Walko

Best-10 pace was +1.5s off pace setter over 21 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 31.2s over race distance

Close pace gap for Kevin Boehm

Best-10 pace was +0.8s off pace setter over 27 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 22.1s over race distance

Improve consistency for Trent Walko

Consistency gap of 0.9s/lap over 21 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 19.8s over race distance

Improve consistency for Kevin Boehm

Consistency gap of 0.6s/lap over 27 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 17.4s over race distance

Improve consistency for Josh Green

Consistency gap of 0.6s/lap over 25 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 14.7s over race distance

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
1	59	Stratus Racing	ZP2	214	-	1:44.422
2	97	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	214	+1:48.616	1:45.147
3	80	Automatic Racing	ZP2	211	3 Laps	1:44.953
5	3	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	207	7 Laps	1:46.805
6	4	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	197	17 Laps	1:45.106
10	77	Nimbus Motorsports	ZP2	165	49 Laps	1:45.960
13	5	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	123	91 Laps	1:46.175
14	57	Stratus Racing	ZP2	114	100 Laps	1:45.324
15	98	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	83	131 Laps	1:46.024