ZRS Sonoma Race 2

Sonoma Raceway · March 14, 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P5You finished P5 of 9 in ZP2, 17 Laps behind the class winner. A mechanical issue was the primary gap (34:04).

P5 of 9

Class Position

17 Laps

Gap to Class P1

197

Laps Completed

1:45.106

Best Lap

•3rd fastest on-track pace in ZP2 (median 1:46.872). On pace alone, a P3 finish.

•Lost 45m 46s across 4 mechanical stops

•Pit crew averaged 1:40.905 — 4.9s faster than class average

Where the Gap Came From

On-track pace (153 laps):-338.7s

Driver errors (3 laps):-78.1s

Pit lane — team ops (13 laps):-251.0s

Pit in/out pace (8 laps):-1.6s

Mechanical (9 laps):+2043.9s

Code 60 (11 laps):-283.4s

Why you're behind #3 (P4 in ZP2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Excluding mechanical issues, you held a net +15m 53s advantage in clean racing.

Biggest time loss

Mechanical (9 laps) at +2043.9s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

CONSISTENCY

Oliver Piatek's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.4s over 70 laps

+100.9s

CONSISTENCY

Kamden Hibbitt's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.0s over 76 laps

+75.1s

CONSISTENCY

Thomas Bellemin's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.9s over 23 laps

+19.7s

PACE

Kamden Hibbitt's best-10 pace was +0.2s/lap off pace setter across 76 laps

+14.6s

WARM UP

Kamden Hibbitt averaged 2 warm-up laps at +1.1s each across 2 stints

+4.5s

PACE

Oliver Piatek's best-10 pace was +0.0s/lap off pace setter across 70 laps

+2.1s

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Thomas Bellemin. Most consistent: Thomas Bellemin.

Thomas Bellemin(pace setter)

23 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:45.752

vs Class Best

+0.7s

Consistency

0.9s(+0.0s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps+0.6s/lap

Oliver Piatek

70 laps across 3 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:45.782

vs Class Best

+0.7s

Consistency

1.4s(+0.6s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Biggest opportunity

Consistency: 1.4s gap vs class best 0.8s — costs 44.3s per stint

Kamden Hibbitt

76 laps across 2 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:45.944

vs Class Best

+0.9s

Consistency

1.0s(+0.2s vs class)

Warm-up

2 laps+1.1s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +0.2s/lap x 76 laps = 14.6s total

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Thomas Bellemin(pace setter)	23	1:45.752	--	0.855s	1 laps	--	--
Oliver Piatek	70	1:45.782	+0.030s	1.441s	1 laps	--	2.1s
Kamden Hibbitt	76	1:45.944	+0.192s	0.988s	2 laps	--	14.6s

Extreme laps (Code 60, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Thomas Bellemin	23	1:46.607	--
3	Oliver Piatek	4	1:55.454	--
4	Oliver Piatek	29	1:46.860	--
5	Oliver Piatek	40	1:47.463	--
6	Kamden Hibbitt	33	1:46.672	--
7	Kamden Hibbitt	43	1:47.133	--

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

Stop Delta

C60 Converted

4 of 6

Code 60 Windows

C60 #10:45:22Did not pit

C60 #21:16:45Pitted

C60 #33:38:54Pitted

C60 #44:06:10Pitted

C60 #54:33:00Pitted

C60 #64:44:50Did not pit — lap 4 of 37-lap stint

Show stop-by-stop detail (8 stops: 4 green, 4 under Code 60)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	2:03:32	Green	2:09.768	Oliver Piatek
#2	3:13:32	Green	1:04.662	Oliver Piatek
#3	5:47:03	C60	1:18.469	Kamden Hibbitt
#4	--	Green	1:38.839	Oliver Piatek → Thomas Bellemin
#5	--	C60	1:09.483	Thomas Bellemin
#6	--	C60	1:30.243	Thomas Bellemin → Kamden Hibbitt
#7	--	C60	1:05.511	Kamden Hibbitt
#8	--	Green	1:50.351	Kamden Hibbitt → Oliver Piatek

Code 60 Impact (6 periods) — net +855.5s

Period	Laps	Biggest Winner	Biggest Loser
C60 #1	25–28	#57 (-15.7s)	#98 (+6118.1s)
C60 #2	39–40
C60 #3	109–111		#98 (+101.9s)
C60 #4	122–124		#97 (+111.1s)
C60 #5	135–136	#80 (-2.2s)	#3 (+12.5s)
C60 #6	140–141	#3 (-15.2s)	#77 (+93.8s)

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Code 60 Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Actions for Next Race

Improve consistency for Oliver Piatek

Consistency gap of 1.4s/lap over 70 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 100.9s over race distance

Improve consistency for Kamden Hibbitt

Consistency gap of 1.0s/lap over 76 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 75.1s over race distance

Improve consistency for Thomas Bellemin

Consistency gap of 0.9s/lap over 23 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 19.7s over race distance

Close pace gap for Kamden Hibbitt

Best-10 pace was +0.2s off pace setter over 76 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 14.6s over race distance

Reduce warm-up laps for Kamden Hibbitt

Averaging 1+ warm-up laps. Target: consistent pace by lap 2. Practice in/out lap sequence.

Est. savings: 4.5s over race distance

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
1	59	Stratus Racing	ZP2	214	-	1:44.422
2	97	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	214	+1:48.616	1:45.147
3	80	Automatic Racing	ZP2	211	3 Laps	1:44.953
5	3	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	207	7 Laps	1:46.805
6	4	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	197	17 Laps	1:45.106
10	77	Nimbus Motorsports	ZP2	165	49 Laps	1:45.960
13	5	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	123	91 Laps	1:46.175
14	57	Stratus Racing	ZP2	114	100 Laps	1:45.324
15	98	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	83	131 Laps	1:46.024