ZRS Sonoma Race 2

Sonoma Raceway · March 14, 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P2You finished P2 of 9 in ZP2, +1:48.616 behind the class winner. On-track pace was the primary gap (4:01).

P2 of 9

Class Position

+1:48.616

Gap to Class P1

214

Laps Completed

1:45.147

Best Lap

•7th fastest on-track pace in ZP2 (median 1:47.616). On pace alone, a P7 finish.

•Lost 15m across 1 mechanical stop

Where the Gap Came From

On-track pace (178 laps):+241.3s

Pit lane — team ops (11 laps):+137.9s

Pit in/out pace (6 laps):+10.4s

Mechanical (4 laps):+54.0s

Code 60 (15 laps):-335.0s

Why you're behind #59 (P1 in ZP2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Biggest time loss

On-track pace (178 laps) at +241.3s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

PACE

Peter Bank's best-10 pace was +1.6s/lap off pace setter across 83 laps

+135.8s

CONSISTENCY

Peter Bank's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.1s over 83 laps

+94.9s

CONSISTENCY

Hampus Ericsson's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.1s over 84 laps

+91.4s

PACE

Eric Powell's best-10 pace was +2.5s/lap off pace setter across 22 laps

+55.3s

CONSISTENCY

Eric Powell's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.4s over 22 laps

+30.3s

DEGRADATION

3 stints showed significant late-stint fade (avg +2.2s)

+6.5s

WARM UP

Hampus Ericsson averaged 2 warm-up laps at +1.4s each across 2 stints

+5.6s

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Hampus Ericsson. Most consistent: Hampus Ericsson.

Hampus Ericsson(pace setter)

84 laps across 2 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:45.542

vs Class Best

+0.5s

Consistency

1.1s(+0.3s vs class)

Warm-up

2 laps+1.4s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Consistency: 1.1s gap vs class best 0.8s — costs 23.5s per stint

Peter Bank

83 laps across 2 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:47.179

vs Class Best

+2.1s

Consistency

1.1s(+0.3s vs class)

Warm-up

1.5 laps+0.3s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +1.6s/lap x 83 laps = 135.8s total

Eric Powell

22 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:48.054

vs Class Best

+3.0s

Consistency

1.4s(+0.6s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +2.5s/lap x 22 laps = 55.3s total

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Hampus Ericsson(pace setter)	84	1:45.542	--	1.089s	2 laps	--	--
Peter Bank	83	1:47.179	+1.636s	1.144s	1.5 laps	+25ms/lap	135.8s
Eric Powell	22	1:48.054	+2.512s	1.379s	1 laps	+198ms/lap	55.3s

Extreme laps (Code 60, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Hampus Ericsson	58	1:46.429	--
2	Hampus Ericsson	31	1:48.223	+120ms/lap
3	Peter Bank	50	1:48.524	+25ms/lap
4	Peter Bank	33	1:48.016	--
5	Eric Powell	22	1:49.433	+198ms/lap

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

Stop Delta

C60 Converted

3 of 6

Code 60 Windows

C60 #10:45:22Pitted

C60 #21:16:45Did not pit — lap 13 of 36-lap stint

C60 #33:38:54Pitted

C60 #44:06:10Pitted

C60 #54:33:00Did not pit — lap 12 of 16-lap stint

C60 #64:44:50Did not pit

Show stop-by-stop detail (6 stops: 3 green, 3 under Code 60)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	1:59:19	C60	1:39.579	Hampus Ericsson
#2	4:06:39	Green	1:51.831	Hampus Ericsson → Peter Bank
#3	4:42:39	Green	1:43.044	Peter Bank
#4	6:00:34	C60	2:14.261	Peter Bank → Eric Powell
#5	--	C60	1:11.391	Eric Powell
#6	--	Green	1:37.237	Peter Bank → Hampus Ericsson

Code 60 Impact (6 periods) — net +145.1s

Period	Laps	Biggest Winner	Biggest Loser
C60 #1	25–28	#57 (-15.7s)	#98 (+6118.1s)
C60 #2	39–40
C60 #3	109–111		#98 (+101.9s)
C60 #4	122–124		#97 (+111.1s)
C60 #5	135–136	#80 (-2.2s)	#3 (+12.5s)
C60 #6	140–141	#3 (-15.2s)	#77 (+93.8s)

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Code 60 Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Actions for Next Race

Close pace gap for Peter Bank

Best-10 pace was +1.6s off pace setter over 83 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 135.8s over race distance

Improve consistency for Peter Bank

Consistency gap of 1.1s/lap over 83 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 94.9s over race distance

Improve consistency for Hampus Ericsson

Consistency gap of 1.1s/lap over 84 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 91.4s over race distance

Close pace gap for Eric Powell

Best-10 pace was +2.5s off pace setter over 22 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 55.3s over race distance

Improve consistency for Eric Powell

Consistency gap of 1.4s/lap over 22 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 30.3s over race distance

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
1	59	Stratus Racing	ZP2	214	-	1:44.422
2	97	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	214	+1:48.616	1:45.147
3	80	Automatic Racing	ZP2	211	3 Laps	1:44.953
5	3	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	207	7 Laps	1:46.805
6	4	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	197	17 Laps	1:45.106
10	77	Nimbus Motorsports	ZP2	165	49 Laps	1:45.960
13	5	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	123	91 Laps	1:46.175
14	57	Stratus Racing	ZP2	114	100 Laps	1:45.324
15	98	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	83	131 Laps	1:46.024