ZRS Barber Race 2

Barber Motorsports Park · April 26 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P5You finished P5 of 9 in ZP2, 9 Laps behind the class winner. Pit in/out transitions were the primary gap (3:18).

P5 of 9

Class Position

9 Laps

Gap to Class P1

vs #59

219

Laps Completed

1:30.998

Best Lap

Patrick Wilmot

•9th fastest on-track pace in ZP2 (median 1:35.418). On pace alone, a P9 finish.

•Lost 1h 4m across 1 mechanical stop

•Lost 2 laps to race control penalty

Where the Gap Came From

Why you're behind #27 (P4 in ZP2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Biggest time loss

Pit in/out pace (6 laps) at +197.7s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

PACE

Chris Scharnow's best-10 pace was +3.3s/lap off pace setter across 74 laps

+247.2s

PACE

Rob Ecklin's best-10 pace was +4.2s/lap off pace setter across 51 laps

+212.2s

CONSISTENCY

Chris Scharnow's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 2.3s over 74 laps

+171.9s

CONSISTENCY

Rob Ecklin's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.4s over 51 laps

+72.0s

CONSISTENCY

Patrick Wilmot's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.8s over 81 laps

+65.2s

WARM UP

Rob Ecklin averaged 7 warm-up laps at +2.7s each across 1 stint

+18.7s

WARM UP

Chris Scharnow averaged 6 warm-up laps at +2.7s each across 1 stint

+16.1s

PIT STOPS

Green-flag pit average was +1.9s vs class average across 4 stops

+7.6s

Actions for Next Race

Close pace gap for Chris Scharnow

Best-10 pace was +3.3s off pace setter over 74 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 247.2s over race distance

Close pace gap for Rob Ecklin

Best-10 pace was +4.2s off pace setter over 51 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 212.2s over race distance

Improve consistency for Chris Scharnow

Consistency gap of 2.3s/lap over 74 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 171.9s over race distance

Improve consistency for Rob Ecklin

Consistency gap of 1.4s/lap over 51 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 72.0s over race distance

Improve consistency for Patrick Wilmot

Consistency gap of 0.8s/lap over 81 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 65.2s over race distance

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Patrick Wilmot. Most consistent: Patrick Wilmot.

Patrick Wilmot(pace setter)

81 laps across 2 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:31.250

vs Class Best

+0.7s

Consistency

0.8s(+0.0s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Chris Scharnow

74 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:34.590

vs Class Best

+4.0s

Consistency

2.3s(+1.5s vs class)

Warm-up

6 laps+2.7s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +3.3s/lap x 74 laps = 247.2s total

Rob Ecklin

51 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:35.410

vs Class Best

+4.9s

Consistency

1.4s(+0.6s vs class)

Warm-up

7 laps+2.7s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +4.2s/lap x 51 laps = 212.2s total

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Patrick Wilmot(pace setter)	81	1:31.250	--	0.805s	1 laps	+32ms/lap	--
Chris Scharnow	74	1:34.590	+3.340s	2.323s	6 laps	--	247.2s
Rob Ecklin	51	1:35.410	+4.160s	1.412s	7 laps	--	212.2s

Extreme laps (caution, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Patrick Wilmot	24	1:31.811	+32ms/lap
2	Rob Ecklin	51	1:36.822	--
3	Chris Scharnow	33	1:36.957	--
7	Patrick Wilmot	57	1:32.158	--

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

Stop Delta

Caution Converted

1 of 2

Caution Windows

Cau #10:38:45Pitted

Cau #22:21:56Did not pit — lap 4 of 4-lap stint

Show stop-by-stop detail (5 stops: 4 green, 1 under caution)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	0:45:03	Caution	2:07.170	Patrick Wilmot → Rob Ecklin
#2	2:12:44	Green	2:12.251	Rob Ecklin → Chris Scharnow
#3	--	Green	1:27.047	Chris Scharnow
#4	4:42:39	Green	1:54.857	Chris Scharnow → Patrick Wilmot
#5	--	Green	1:07.989	Patrick Wilmot

Code 60 Pace

Your Code 60 Pace

96.5s

137.1 kph

Field Median

97.1s

136.3 kph

Delta (per lap)

-0.6s

42 Code 60 laps

Est. Total Lost

Caution Impact (3 periods) — net +154.3s

Period	Laps	Biggest Winner	Biggest Loser
Cau #1	25–27	#908 (-9.1s)	#909 (+177.7s)
Cau #2	88–134	#909 (-23.4s)	#5 (+49.0s)

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Caution Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
1	59	Stratus Racing	ZP2	228	-	1:30.354
2	4	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	228	+1:12.437	1:31.261
3	3	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	223	5 Laps	1:33.247
4	27	Powell Racing	ZP2	220	8 Laps	1:31.131
5	909	Automatic Racing	ZP2	219	9 Laps	1:30.998
6	77	Nimbus Racing	ZP2	218	10 Laps	1:30.832
12	5	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	202	26 Laps	1:31.890
14	908	Automatic Racing	ZP2	200	28 Laps	1:30.623
16	57	Stratus Racing	ZP2	199	29 Laps	1:30.444