ZRS Sonoma Race 1

Sonoma Raceway · March 14, 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P4You finished P4 of 4 in ZR2, 114 Laps behind the class winner. Pit stops were the primary gap (3:55).

P4 of 4

Class Position

114 Laps

Gap to Class P1

114

Laps Completed

1:49.762

Best Lap

•2nd fastest on-track pace in ZR2 (median 1:50.967). On pace alone, a P2 finish.

•Lost 3h 13m across 2 mechanical stops

Where the Gap Came From

Analysis covers Laps 1-114 (car retired)

Reference car retired at Lap 117 — comparison covers partial race

On-track pace (91 laps):-699.5s

Driver errors (1 lap):-64.0s

Pit lane — team ops (5 laps):+235.3s

Pit in/out pace (3 laps):+3.2s

Mechanical (8 laps):-4537.3s

Code 60 (6 laps):+158.9s

Why you're behind #41 (P3 in ZR2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Biggest time loss

Pit lane — team ops (5 laps) at +235.3s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

CONSISTENCY

Anthony Piselli's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 2.0s over 44 laps

+89.3s

CONSISTENCY

Clark Cambern's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 0.9s over 56 laps

+48.1s

PACE

Anthony Piselli's best-10 pace was +0.5s/lap off pace setter across 44 laps

+20.6s

DEGRADATION

1 stint showed significant late-stint fade (avg +1.8s)

+1.8s

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Clark Cambern. Most consistent: Clark Cambern.

Clark Cambern(pace setter)

56 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:49.969

vs Class Best

+2.9s

Consistency

0.9s(+-0.4s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Anthony Piselli

44 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:50.436

vs Class Best

+3.4s

Consistency

2.0s(+0.8s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps

Biggest opportunity

Consistency: 2.0s gap vs class best 1.3s — costs 33.4s per stint

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Clark Cambern(pace setter)	56	1:49.969	--	0.858s	1 laps	+7ms/lap	--
Anthony Piselli	44	1:50.436	+0.467s	2.029s	1 laps	+47ms/lap	20.6s

Extreme laps (Code 60, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Clark Cambern	56	1:50.827	+7ms/lap
3	Anthony Piselli	44	1:52.464	+47ms/lap

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

4.5

Stop Delta

-0.5

C60 Converted

0 of 4

Code 60 Windows

C60 #11:17:05Did not pit — lap 13 of 35-lap stint

C60 #22:07:07Did not pit — lap 0 of 31-lap stint

C60 #32:46:17Did not pit — lap 21 of 31-lap stint

C60 #46:00:37Did not pit

Show stop-by-stop detail (4 stops: 4 green, 0 under Code 60)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	2:02:58	Green	2:22.612	Clark Cambern
#2	3:07:28	Green	2:15.676	Clark Cambern → Anthony Piselli
#3	--	Green	1:55.811	Anthony Piselli
#4	--	Green	1:58.096	Anthony Piselli

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Code 60 Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Actions for Next Race

Improve consistency for Anthony Piselli

Consistency gap of 2.0s/lap over 44 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 89.3s over race distance

Improve consistency for Clark Cambern

Consistency gap of 0.9s/lap over 56 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 48.1s over race distance

Close pace gap for Anthony Piselli

Best-10 pace was +0.5s off pace setter over 44 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 20.6s over race distance

Address late-stint pace fade

1 stint showed significant degradation. Review tire management and stint length strategy.

Est. savings: 1.8s over race distance

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
6	95	Nine-Four Motorsports	ZR2	219	9 Laps	1:46.800
7	94	Nine-Four Motorsports	ZR2	211	17 Laps	1:51.618
15	41	Retro Rockets	ZR2	117	111 Laps	1:51.448
16	177	Cambern Performance	ZR2	114	114 Laps	1:49.762