ZRS Sonoma Race 1

Sonoma Raceway · March 14, 2026 · 7 hours

The Verdict

P9You finished P9 of 9 in ZP2, 53 Laps behind the class winner. A mechanical issue was the primary gap (32:56).

P9 of 9

Class Position

53 Laps

Gap to Class P1

175

Laps Completed

1:44.671

Best Lap

•7th fastest on-track pace in ZP2 (median 1:46.783). On pace alone, a P7 finish.

•Lost 1h 33m across 5 mechanical stops

Where the Gap Came From

On-track pace (142 laps):+59.4s

Driver errors (1 lap):+5.5s

Pit lane — team ops (10 laps):-157.8s

Pit in/out pace (6 laps):-13.9s

Mechanical (12 laps):+1975.8s

Code 60 (4 laps):-212.8s

Why you're behind #80 (P8 in ZP2) — red = time lost, green = time gained

Excluding mechanical issues, you held a net +5m 20s advantage in clean racing.

Biggest time loss

Mechanical (12 laps) at +1975.8s

Time Opportunities

Ranked by total impact — fix the biggest ones first

CONSISTENCY

Hampus Ericsson's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.5s over 87 laps

+134.6s

PACE

Peter Bank's best-10 pace was +1.4s/lap off pace setter across 41 laps

+56.1s

CONSISTENCY

Peter Bank's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.2s over 41 laps

+48.4s

PACE

Eric Powell's best-10 pace was +1.4s/lap off pace setter across 26 laps

+36.8s

CONSISTENCY

Eric Powell's consistency gap (avg minus best-10) was 1.3s over 26 laps

+34.6s

WARM UP

Eric Powell averaged 4 warm-up laps at +2.9s each across 1 stint

+11.4s

INCIDENTS

Eric Powell had 1 incident costing +5.1s avg (worst: +5.1s)

+5.1s

PIT STOPS

Green-flag pit average was +1.1s vs class average across 4 stops

+4.6s

WARM UP

Hampus Ericsson averaged 1.5 warm-up laps at +0.8s each across 2 stints

+2.3s

Driver Spotlight

Best stint pace: Hampus Ericsson. Most consistent: Peter Bank.

Hampus Ericsson(pace setter)

87 laps across 2 stints

Best-10 Avg

1:44.970

vs Class Best

+1.2s

Consistency

1.5s(+0.7s vs class)

Warm-up

1.5 laps+0.8s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Consistency: 1.5s gap vs class best 0.9s — costs 59.6s per stint

Peter Bank

41 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:46.338

vs Class Best

+2.5s

Consistency

1.2s(+0.3s vs class)

Warm-up

1 laps+0.2s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +1.4s/lap x 41 laps = 56.1s total

Eric Powell

26 laps across 1 stint

Best-10 Avg

1:46.387

vs Class Best

+2.6s

Consistency

1.3s(+0.5s vs class)

Warm-up

4 laps+2.9s/lap

Biggest opportunity

Pace: +1.4s/lap x 26 laps = 36.8s total

Show full driver comparison table

Driver	Laps	Best-10 Avg	Gap to Best	Consistency	Warm-up	Degradation	Opportunity
Hampus Ericsson(pace setter)	87	1:44.970	--	1.547s	1.5 laps	--	--
Peter Bank	41	1:46.338	+1.368s	1.181s	1 laps	--	56.1s
Eric Powell	26	1:46.387	+1.417s	1.332s	4 laps	--	36.8s

Extreme laps (Code 60, unusually slow laps) and pit laps excluded from all calculations.

Stint Breakdown

Stint #	Driver	Laps	Avg Lap	Degradation
1	Hampus Ericsson	61	1:46.595	--
2	Hampus Ericsson	26	1:46.334	--
4	Peter Bank	41	1:47.519	--
6	Eric Powell	26	1:47.719	--

View Full Team Analysis →

Pit Strategy

Your Stops

Class Median

Stop Delta

-1

C60 Converted

1 of 4

Code 60 Windows

C60 #11:17:05Pitted

C60 #22:07:07Did not pit

C60 #32:46:17Did not pit — lap 10 of 35-lap stint

C60 #46:00:37Did not pit — lap 12 of 12-lap stint

Show stop-by-stop detail (5 stops: 4 green, 1 under Code 60)

Stop #	Elapsed	Flag	Duration	Driver Change
#1	2:06:05	Green	2:18.917	Hampus Ericsson
#2	4:31:15	C60	1:15.497	Hampus Ericsson
#3	4:33:38	Green	2:23.536	Peter Bank
#4	4:45:16	Green	45.166s	Eric Powell
#5	--	Green	2:22.085	Eric Powell → Hampus Ericsson

Code 60 Impact (4 periods) — net -95.4s

Period	Laps	Biggest Winner	Biggest Loser
C60 #1	42–44	#57 (-109.0s)	#3 (+20.5s)
C60 #2	68–69		#59 (+137.0s)
C60 #3	88–89
C60 #4	195–196	#80 (-121.7s)	#3 (+0.7s)

Positions & Gaps →Full Pit Analysis →Code 60 Impact →

View Conditions Analysis →

Actions for Next Race

Improve consistency for Hampus Ericsson

Consistency gap of 1.5s/lap over 87 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 134.6s over race distance

Close pace gap for Peter Bank

Best-10 pace was +1.4s off pace setter over 41 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 56.1s over race distance

Improve consistency for Peter Bank

Consistency gap of 1.2s/lap over 41 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 48.4s over race distance

Close pace gap for Eric Powell

Best-10 pace was +1.4s off pace setter over 26 laps. Focus on sectors with the largest delta.

Est. savings: 36.8s over race distance

Improve consistency for Eric Powell

Consistency gap of 1.3s/lap over 26 laps. Partially explained by warm-up and degradation — focus on mid-stint variation.

Est. savings: 34.6s over race distance

Final Classification

P	#	Team	Class	Laps	Gap	Best
1	4	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	228	-	1:44.648
2	57	Stratus Racing	ZP2	228	+1:37.461	1:43.383
3	59	Stratus Racing	ZP2	225	3 Laps	1:44.355
4	77	Nimbus Motorsports	ZP2	224	4 Laps	1:44.844
5	3	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	219	9 Laps	1:45.900
9	5	Round 3 Racing	ZP2	201	27 Laps	1:45.338
11	98	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	199	29 Laps	1:44.735
12	80	Automatic Racing	ZP2	190	38 Laps	1:44.434
13	97	Random Vandals Racing	ZP2	175	53 Laps	1:44.671